Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author describes the five decades of efforts by residents in the medical schools of the province of Quebec, Canada, to negotiate scientific, cultural, social, and economic issues that affect them as trainees. At present, the residents' association, the Fédération des Médecine résidents du Quebec negotiates collective agreements on working conditions and other issues with the Quebec Ministry of Health, not the hospital association. The federation has become recognized as an important body throughout Canada, and its representatives regularly participate in meetings concerning the country's health care system. The author describes the duty hours provisions of the current collective agreement (1996-2002), and remarks that in general, the agreement's regulations are helpful to residents, prevent the possibility of abusive work schedules, and, among other benefits, provide generous time off for conferences, examinations, and study time. However, some residents, particularly those in surgical disciplines, believe that the work-hours provisions are too restrictive, as they wish to maximize their acute-care surgical experiences in the operating room via frequent on-call hours. At present, residents in all disciplines are allowed to remain in the hospital to attend to patient care duties as much as they wish, but they may not be on official call more than is stipulated by the collective agreement. These agreements have also created some difficulties in providing coverage for patients; the author discusses various solutions to this problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".