Corrigendum: Genomic discrimination by in situ hybridization in Icelandic species of <i>Elymus</i> and <i>Elytrigia</i> (Poaceae: Triticeae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1) It was discovered that H9083 has been identified as a tetraploid species of Elymus (StStHH), not a diploid species of Psedoroegneria spicata as stated in the paper referenced above. Genomic DNA from this accession was used as probe DNA, combined with differently labelled genomic DNA from Hordeum (HH) and unlabeled blocking DNA from Elymus (NsNsXmXm), on species of Elymus and Elytrigia. Because of this, only St-genome specific sequences in the StH probe were free to hybridize to chromosomes, the same way as the St probe would have performed. However, the results of the combined probe are still to be interpreted as reported in the aforementioned paper, and results from fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses using localized probes have confirmed and redefined the original genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".