MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Genome
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,706 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,706 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 55

Labels cover 2 of 2,706 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,706 of 2,706 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundvenueunlabeled
Machine learning for precision medicine
Sarah J. MacEachern, Nils D. Forkert
2020· review· en· Genome· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
452
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Pollen DNA barcoding: current applications and future prospects
Karen L. Bell, Natasha de Vere, Alexander Keller, Rodney T. Richardson, Annemarie Gous, Kevin S. Burgess +1 more
2016· review· en· Genome· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
276
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Fungal DNA barcoding
Jianping Xu
2016· review· en· Genome· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
242
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Ancestral genome duplication in rice
Romain Guyot, Beat Keller
2004· article· en· Genome· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
176
citations
venueno affunlabeled
A genetic analysis of seed and berry weight in grapevine
José Antonio Cabezas, M. Cervera, Leonor Ruiz‐García, J. Carreño, José M. Martı́nez-Zapater
2006· article· en· Genome· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
168
citations
fundvenueno affunlabeled
Chromosomal rearrangements in wheat: their types and distribution
Е. Д. Бадаева, О. С. Дедкова, G. Gay, V. A. Pukhalskyi, А. В. Зеленин, S. Bernard +1 more
2007· article· en· Genome· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
161
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About