Mining single-nucleotide polymorphisms from hexaploid wheat ESTs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) represent a new form of functional marker, particularly when they are derived from expressed sequence tags (ESTs). A bioinformatics strategy was developed to discover SNPs within a large wheat EST database and to demonstrate the utility of SNPs in genetic mapping and genetic diversity applications. A collection of > 90000 wheat ESTs was assembled into contiguous sequences (contigs), and 45 random contigs were then visually inspected to identify primer pairs capable of amplifying specific alleles. We estimate that homoeologue sequence variants occurred 1 in 24 bp and the frequency of SNPs between wheat genotypes was 1 SNP/540 bp (theta = 0.0069). Furthermore, we estimate that one diagnostic SNP test can be developed from every contig with 10-60 EST members. Thus, EST databases are an abundant source of SNP markers. Polymorphism information content for SNPs ranged from 0.04 to 0.50 and ESTs could be mapped into a framework of microsatellite markers using segregating populations. The results showed that SNPs in wheat can be discovered in ESTs, validated, and be applied to conventional genetic studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it