Genetic diversity of root-knot nematodes from Brazil and development of SCAR markers specific for the coffee-damaging species
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RAPD markers were used to characterize the genetic diversity and relationships of root-knot nematodes (RKN) (Meloidogyne spp.) in Brazil. A high level of infraspecific polymorphism was detected in Meloidogyne arenaria, Meloidogyne exigua, and Meloidogyne hapla compared with the other species tested. Phylogenetic analyses showed that M. hapla and M. exigua are more closely related to one another than they are to the other species, and illustrated the early divergence of these meiotically reproducing species from the mitotic ones. To develop a PCR-based assay to specifically identify RKN associated with coffee, three RAPD markers were further transformed into sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers specific for M. exigua, Meloigogyne incognita and Meloidogyne paranaensis, respectively. After PCR using the SCAR primers, the initial polymorphism was retained as the presence or absence of amplification. Moreover, multiplex PCR using the three pairs of SCAR primers in a single reaction enabled the unambiguous identification of each species, even in mixtures. Therefore, it is concluded that the method developed here has potential for application in routine diagnostic procedures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it