MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1964102121 · doi:10.2118/143710-ms

Successful Applications of Pressure-Rate Deconvolution in the Cad-Nik Tight Gas Formations of BC Foothills, Canada

2011· article· en· W1964102121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jack R. Jones, A. Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPetroleum engineeringTight gasNatural gasUnconventional oilMaterial balanceLead (geology)ExtrapolationDeconvolutionFoothillsPetrologyHydraulic fracturingComputer scienceGeomorphologyEngineeringPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Cadomin-Nikanassin (Cad-Nik) sandstone formations in the lower Cretaceous reservoirs along the reverse thrust faulting belt of North Eastern British Columbia, Canada, have emerged in the recent years as a new tight gas play. The low porosity (3% ~ 6%) of the rock matrix controls gas storativity, while the presence of natural fractures in the form of clusters or swarms allows significant and sustainable flow rates for commercial productions. Newly drilled wells are commonly hydraulically fractured to establish or enhance wellbore connectivity to the natural fracture network. Seismic mappings of these structural unconventional gas reservoirs provide the early assessments of resource sizes and initial gas-in-place (IGIP), which usually bear huge certainties due to the difficulty of determining reservoir structural closures and pay porosity cutoffs. Regional analogue wells are often used to guide development decisions. Meanwhile estimating connected reservoir volumes through conventional gas material balances (P/Z vs. cum production) and production data analysis (RTA) has not been without challenges. Fairly long pressure buildups, on the order of 100's of hours, are often performed without seeing any pressure stabilization. The applicability of pressure extrapolation to these tests has not been systematically investigated. Thus, reliable average reservoir pressure estimates require much longer well shut-in times in order to perform meaningful gas material balance. Since this is not practical, confidence in material balance results requires a second, independent method for establishing connected well volumes to be used in comparisons and cross-checking. One possible choice is rate-transeint analysis (RTA) but, in these fields, many times well head pressure data are also unavailable or unreliable. This paper presents two field case studies, which demonstrate the successful application of the pressure-rate deconvolution approach combining a well's long, high quality production rate history with accurate downhole pressure data from relatively short buildup tests. This approach allows the reservoir engineer to (1) reconcile the performance based EUR estimates with the volumetric OGIPs, (2) establish, at least, minimum well drainage size and connected volume and (3) pick possible infill-drilling opportunities. A final benefit is that this often leads to a better understanding of well/reservoir parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→