MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964143800 · doi:10.1139/e03-078

Hot spring and geyser sinters: the integrated product of precipitation, replacement, and deposition

2003· article· en· W1964143800 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Brian Jones, Robin W. Renaut

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyHot springCalciteDeposition (geology)Cementation (geology)GeochemistryDetritusPrecipitationSpring (device)MineralogyCementGeomorphologyPaleontologyMaterials scienceMetallurgyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complex ornate sinter deposits are found in many hot spring and geysers systems throughout the world, including those located in the Taupo Volcanic Zone on the North Island of New Zealand. Those sinters are formed of opal-A that replaced microbes, opal-A precipitated as cement, accessory minerals (e.g., kaolinite, jarosite, calcite), biological detritus (e.g., leaves, wood, pollen grains), and lithic detritus. The opal-A is compositionally variable because of the amount of water (OH and H2O) and, in some cases, accessory elements (e.g., Au, Ag) bound into its structure. The composition and fabric of the siliceous sinter found at any locality reflect the relative balance among the processes of replacement, precipitation, and deposition. The microbes that inhabit these systems are of critical importance because they are commonly replaced by and (or) encrusted with opal-A. In many settings, copious amounts of opal-A are precipitated as cement around the frameworks of silicified filaments. The cementation process, which continues for as long as waters supersaturated with respect to opal-A flow through the sinter, commonly reduces the porosity of the sinters by as much as 50%. This process is probably of far greater significance than has been previously recognized. The textural and compositional complexity of siliceous sinters found in hot spring and geyser systems reflects the myriad of interrelated processes that control their formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207