MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964156098 · doi:10.1080/10937400802545060

Database for Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling: Physiological Data for Healthy and Health-Impaired Elderly

2008· review· en· W1964156098 on OpenAlexaff
Chad M. Thompson, Douglas O. Johns, Babasaheb Sonawane, Hugh A. Barton, Dale Hattis, Robert Tardif, Kannan Krishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysiologically based pharmacokinetic modellingMedicineDatabaseDiabetes mellitusVariance (accounting)COPDGerontologyDiseaseObesityPharmacokineticsDemographyInternal medicineEndocrinologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have increasingly been employed in chemical health risk assessments. By incorporating individual variability conferred by genetic polymorphisms, health conditions, and physiological changes during development and aging, PBPK models are ideal for predicting chemical disposition in various subpopulations of interest. In order to improve the parameterization of PBPK models for healthy and health-impaired elderly (herein defined as those aged 65 yr and older), physiological parameter values were obtained from the peer-reviewed literature, evaluated, and entered into a Microsoft ACCESS database. Database records include values for key age-specific model inputs such as ventilation rates, organ volumes and blood flows, glomerular filtration rates, and other clearance-related processes. In total, 528 publications were screened for relevant data, resulting in the inclusion of 155 publications comprising 1051 data records for healthy elderly adults and 115 data records for elderly with conditions such as diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, heart disease, and renal disease. There are no consistent trends across parameters or their associated variance with age; the gross variance in body weight decreased with advancing age, whereas there was no change in variance for brain weight. The database contains some information to inform ethnic and gender differences in parameters; however, the majority of the published data pertain to Asian (mostly Japanese) and Caucasian males. As expected, the number of records tends to decrease with advancing age. In addition to a general lack of data for parameters in the elderly with various health conditions, there is also a dearth of information on blood and tissue composition in all elderly groups. Importantly, there are relatively few records for alveolar ventilation rate; therefore, the relationship between this parameter and cardiac output (usually assumed to be 1:1) in the elderly is not well informed by the database. Despite these limitations, the database represents a potentially useful resource for parameterizing PBPK models for the elderly to facilitate the prediction of dose metrics in older populations for application in risk assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0180.019
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.728
GPT teacher head0.525
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part BSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207