Analysis of Human Papillomavirus in Schneiderian Papillomas as Compared to Chronic Sinusitis and Normal Nasal Mucosa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Schneiderian papillomas (SPs) are tumours arising from the surface epithelium (schneiderian epithelium) of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Evidence points toward a viral etiology, specifically human papillomavirus (HPV). Although substantial data indicate HPV as a likely etiology, little is known about the role of HPV in benign nasal pathologies or in normal nasal mucosa. The objective of this study was to characterize the relationship between HPV and SP, chronic sinusitis (CS), and normal nasal mucosa. A case-control study was undertaken, matching patients with SP to patients with CS. Patients with normal nasal mucosa served as a control group. All patients had their tissues analyzed for the presence of various HPV subtypes using line blot assay. A total of 168 patients were identified (74 SP, 74 CS, 20 control). Of these, 70 (41.7%) had detectable deoxyribonucleic acid and 9 of 70 (12.9%) had detectable HPV of subtypes 6, 11, and 16. None had detectable HPV type 18. Significant differences were detected in the presence of HPV in the CS, SP, and control groups, as well as in the presence of low- versus high-risk subtypes among investigation and control groups. Significant differences exist in HPV infectivity among SP, benign nasal pathologies such as CS, and normal nasal mucosa. Human papillomavirus plays an important role, at least in part, in the development of SP, with types 6, 11, and 16 being more pivotal than other types. Line blot assay is a useful technique in identifying HPV in SP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".