MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964178367 · doi:10.1038/npre.2011.6449.1

Singlet-triplet excitation energies of substituted benzenes: A G4 theoretical study

2011· preprint· en· W1964178367 on OpenAlexafffund
Sierra Rayne, Kaya Forest

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Precedings · 2011
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Polytechnic
FundersWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsSinglet stateChemistryDensity functional theoryGround stateTriplet stateExcitationMultiplicity (mathematics)MoietyAdiabatic processComputational chemistryPhotochemistryAtomic physicsMoleculePhysicsExcited stateStereochemistryQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Singlet-triplet adiabatic (AE~S-T~) and well-to-well (WWE~S-T~) excitation energies of variously substituted phenyl cations were calculated at the G4 level of theory. The G4 E~S-T~ estimates range from 19 to 40 kJ/mol higher than prior density functional theory based predictions for these cations, and suggest that E~S-T~ and ground state multiplicity structure-property trends for phenyl cations previously proposed in the literature may be incorrect. Among the substituents considered, meta-substituted phenyl cations with electron donating groups have singlet ground states, and are not isoenergetic with the corresponding triplet states as previously claimed. Depending on the functional group, ortho- or para- substituted phenyl cations may also be ground state singlets despite the presence of an electron donating moiety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature PrecedingsSame topicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207