MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964202842 · doi:10.2509/naf2013.008.012

Uncovering chemical variability: molecular data reveal the identity of a sterile crustose lichen from the Yukon and affirm an expanded circumscription for <em>Buellia griseovirens</em>

2013· article· en· W1964202842 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessica L. Allen, James C. Lendemer

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American Fungi · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Environmental BiologyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCladePhylogenetic treeBiologyCircumscriptionLichenCrustoseTaxonInternal transcribed spacerEvolutionary biologyMolecular phylogeneticsBotanyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here we present the results of a study using molecular data (nrITS and mtSSU sequences) to aid in the identification of a sterile, sorediate crustose lichen from the Yukon Territory of Canada. BLASTn and megaBLAST indicated an affinity to the family Caliciaceae, specifically the Buellioideae. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of mtSSU sequences from the Caliciaceae affirmed this placement, and recovered a strongly supported clade composed of the unidentified populations and members of Buellia s.l. Internal transcribed spacer sequences of the taxon were >99% similar to two sequences of B. griseovirens , a relationship supported by additional molecular phylogenetic analyses. This is the first report of the occurrence of norstictic acid deficient populations of B. griseovirens from North America. It is also the first study to use molecular data to examine, and confirm, some of the chemical variability in B. griseovirens proposed in previous revisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American FungiSame topicLichen and fungal ecologyFrench-language works237,207