Efficient Synthesis and Astonishing Supramolecular Architectures of Several Symmetric Macrolactams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis of four C(n) symmetric macrocyclic lactams cyclo-[NH-CH(2)-CH=CH-CH(2)-CO](n) (1, n=2; 2, n=3; 3, n=4) and cyclo-[NH-CH(2)-CH(2)-CH=CH-CO](3) (4) has been achieved by two approaches. A linear route leads to precursors that are subsequently macrocyclized in a separate step. The second, convergent approach relies on the symmetry of the targets: it includes suitably activated subunits, which are subjected to macrocyclization conditions. The subunits first oligomerize, then cyclize to form either pure macrolactams or mixtures. The macrolactam units 1, 2 and 4 stack on top each other through weak interactions (hydrogen bond and van der Waals), to form endless square, rectangular and triangular prisms, respectively. These stacks are further packed side by side in crystals grown from isotropic media. The overall dipoles in the crystals from lactams 1 and 4, which result mostly from the alignment of amide groups, are zero and large, respectively. Macrolactam 2 displays an astonishing isomorphism when allowed to cool down in anisotropic liquid crystal solutions. Large hollow hexagonal tubes are then obtained through a fractal process. Contrary to the three previous rings, 3 yields crystals where prisms of any shape are absent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".