Histologic, Histochemical, and Ultrastructural Analysis of Soft Tissues from Cleft and Normal Lips
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cause of cleft lip remains speculative. The nature and extent of pathophysiologic changes in cleft lip muscle are controversial. This study was undertaken to better understand the developmental processes at work. There were two groups of patients. In group 1, 40 fresh tissue specimens were taken from 22 patients who were 2 to 5 months old-their age at the time of their primary cleft lip repair. In group 2, eight control specimens were collected from six children who were seen in the emergency department with lip lacerations. Fresh specimens fixed in neutral buffered formalin were evaluated by the use of hematoxylin and eosin with Luxol fast blue, Bielschowsky, and Masson trichrome stains. Fresh frozen tissue was histochemically assessed by the use of hematoxylin and eosin, modified Gomori trichrome, and adenosine triphosphatase. Ultrastructural analysis was performed on fine sections of glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue. Histologic examination revealed increased endomysial and perimysial collagen in cleft specimens with evidence of muscle-bundle size variation and nonneurogenic atrophy. Insignificant differences were observed between cleft-side and noncleft-side specimens when the means of 200 counts of neural-tissue bundles in the subdermis were compared (p = 0.093). Histochemical examination revealed no typical checkerboard pattern, but a preponderance of type 2 fiber was seen. By means of electron microscopy, increased numbers of subsarcolemmal mitochondria were found in cleft, noncleft, and control specimens. Increased absolute numbers of mitochondria and variations in size, shape, and crystal arrangement were identified. In conclusion, there is no evidence of deficient neural supply in the cleft lip. There is also no evidence of neurogenic muscle atrophy or a metabolic abnormality. There are characteristic myopathic changes. These, in concert with the observed interstitial fibrosis, may have far-reaching implications for growth and function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".