Synthesis, spectral, crystal structural, antimicrobial, DNA interaction and thermal behavior of some new zinc halide complexes: 3D supramolecular structure of zinc bromide complex
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three new four coordinated zinc(II) complexes have been synthesized and characterized by IR, UV, elemental analysis, 1H and 13C NMR and X-ray single crystal analysis. The elemental analyses of the complexes are in agreement with the general formula of ZnLX2 wherein L = Schiff base ligand and X = Cl−, Br− and I−. Low molar conductivities in DMF indicated non-electrolyte character of all complexes. Spectroscopic studies well confirmed the coordination via azomethine nitrogens of the ligand to zinc ion. The single crystal X-ray analysis shows that ZnLBr2 crystallizes in the triclinic crystal system with space group P1¯. It contains two crystallographically independent molecules noted as A and B, with both Zn1A and Zn1B being almost in perfect tetrahedral environments (τ4 = 0.94 for Zn1A and τ4 = 0.93 for Zn1B). A detailed structural analysis shows that there are three non-classical hydrogen bondings of C–H…Br in the structure. Various C–H…π and C–H…Br interactions play an important role in stabilizing the molecular structure and then give rise to a 3D supramolecular structure of the ZnLBr2 complex. After characterization, the Schiff base and its complexes were screened in vitro for their antibacterial and antifungal activities by disk diffusion technique. Also the ability of the complexes for DNA cleavage was studied by agarose gel electrophoresis method. Finally, thermal behavior of the complexes has been studied by thermo-gravimetry and then some activation kinetics parameters of decomposition steps were evaluated based on TG/DTG plots.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it