The Osteoinductive Activity of Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) Purified by Repeated Extracts of Bovine Bone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Native bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) extracted from bone have been used clinically to stimulate bone regeneration and repair. However, preparation of purified BMP is a laborious process. This study investigated the yield, activity and cost effectiveness of repeatedly extracting the same bone matrix to produce purified BMP. While repeated extraction was able to increase the yield 62% the activity of the partially purified BMP in later extracts decreased both in vitro and in vivo. This decline in activity appears to be due to an increase in non-BMP contaminants, such as collagen, in the extracts. When the first three extracts were combined and processed together activity was equivalent to that of the first extract. A simple analysis based on the cost of reagents used and the time required for purification indicates that separate processing of the extracts is inefficient while combining the first and second extracts and processing them together would result in a small cost saving. Based on this study we would recommend that the demineralized bone matrix be extracted no more than twice and that the extracts be combined for further processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".