Floral development and anatomy of<i>Pentadiplandra</i>(Pentadiplandraceae): a key genus in the identification of floral morphological trends in the core Brassicales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development and anatomy of leaves and flowers have been investigated in the monotypic species Pentadiplandra brazzeana to discuss its position relative to the core Brassicales and to clarify floral evolutionary trends within the order. Young leaves are flanked by two large stipules that shrivel at anthesis. Young flowers develop as elliptical primordia on a flattened raceme. Sepal initiation is sequential, starting with the lateral sepals and ending with three median sepals. The petals and diplostemonous androecium arise as regular whorls. Five antesepalous carpels develop into a saccate gynoecium with axile placentation. Petals develop a cushion-like basal appendage covering the extrastaminal nectary. Several ontogenetic and anatomical data of the flower support the basal position of Pentadiplandra in the evolution of the core Brassicales and for the derivation of the order from pentamerous diplostemonous ancestors. A derivation of the tetramerous Capparaceae and Brassicaceae as well as hexamerous Tovariaceae is discussed. A number of synapomorphies are identified: sequential sepal initiation with laterals preceding median sepals, retarded petal growth, a (andro)gynophore, the extrastaminal nectary, and stipulate leaves. The peculiar androecium of the Brassicaceae is caused by the strong median compression of the flower, leading to the loss and displacement of median stamens. The derivation of a parietal placenta from an axile placenta is supported. Evidence supports a close link with either Tovariaceae or Capparaceae, concomitant with macromolecular results.Key words: core Brassicales, Capparaceae, Pentadiplandra brazzeana, Tovariaceae, molecular phylogeny, floral development, anatomy, diplostemony, placentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".