MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964325897 · doi:10.1061/9780784413692.141

Modeling Spatial and Functional Interdependencies of Civil Infrastructure Networks

2014· article· en· W1964325897 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Atef, Osama Moselhi

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2014 · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterdependenceAsset (computer security)Computer scienceInterdependent networksAsset managementRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessComputer securityFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asset management targets the sustainability of civil infrastructure throughout combining engineering and economic principles to meet customers' needs and avoid likely catastrophic failures. In the past decade, researchers commonly focused on developing techniques for understanding and controlling the performance of isolated infrastructure networks by using various simulations and statistical and optimization techniques. However, the developed models overlooked the spatial and functional interdependencies between various civil infrastructure. For instance, consider failure in a water main, the structural and functional capacity of the spatially interdependent road may likely be compromised thus affecting other surrounding roads' functionality. This raises the call for developing integrated asset management tools for identifying interdependent assets and capturing to which extent one asset failure can affect neighboring assets' performance. This paper provides a framework for capturing spatially and functionally interdependent assets that consists of two models: 1) a spatial interdependency model and 2) a functional interdependency model. The spatial interdependency model utilizes ArcGIS geoprocessing tools in determining geographically interdependent assets. The spatial interdependency model encapsulates the interdependent assets in a set of new layers and a new generated database containing characteristics of such interdependencies. However, the functional interdependency model employs graph theory principles in determining an asset's degree of connectivity with its neighboring assets. The functional model will aid in recognizing the likely influence of an asset failure on its neighboring assets' performance using two proposed parameters: 1) neighborhood centrality and 2) significant point variance. A case study using City of London water and road network will be used to demonstrate the potential for applying the proposed framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePipelines 2014Same topicInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207