MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964330840 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181877bbb

Three-Dimensional Classification of Thoracic Scoliotic Curves

2008· article· en· W1964330840 on OpenAlexaff
Archana Sangole, Carl‐Éric Aubin, Hubert Labelle, Ian A. F. Stokes, Lawrence G. Lenke, Roger P. Jackson, Peter O. Newton

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustinePolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronal planeMedicineSagittal planeScoliosisRadiographyCobb angleOrthodonticsDeformityThoracic vertebraeKyphosisAnatomyLumbarLumbar vertebraeRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Three-dimensional (3D) characterization of the thoracic scoliotic spine (cross-sectional study). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the presence of subgroups within Lenke type-1 curves by evaluating the thoracic segment indices extracted from 3D reconstructions of the spine, and to propose a new clinically relevant means (the daVinci representation) to report 3D spinal deformities. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although scoliosis is recognized to be a 3D deformity of the spine its measurement and classification have predominantly been based on radiographs which are 2D projections in the coronal and sagittal planes. METHODS: Thoracic segment indices derived from 3D reconstructions of coronal and sagittal standing radiographs of 172 patients with right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, reviewed by the 3D Classification Committee of the Scoliosis Research Society, were analyzed using the ISOData unsupervised clustering algorithm. Four curve indices were analyzed: Cobb angle, axial rotation of the apical vertebrae, orientation of the plane of maximum curvature of the main thoracic curve, and kyphosis (T4-T12). No assumptions were made regarding grouping tendencies in the data nor were the number of clusters predefined. RESULTS: Three primary groups were revealed wherein kyphosis and the orientation of the PMC of the main thoracic curve were the major discriminating factors with slight overlap between groups. A small group (G1) of 22 patients having smaller, nonsurgical (minor) curves was identified. Although the remaining patients had similar Cobb angles they were split into 2 groups (G2: 79 patients; G3: 71 patients) with different PMC (G2: 65 degrees -81 degrees ; G3: 76 degrees -104 degrees ) and kyphotic measures (G2: 23 degrees -43 degrees ; G3: 7 degrees -25 degrees). CONCLUSION: Two distinct subgroups within the surgical cases (major curves) of Lenke type-1 curves were found thus suggesting that thoracic curves are not always hypokyphotic. The ISOData cluster analysis technique helped to capture inherent 3D structural curve complexities that were not evident in a 2D radiographic plane. The daVinci representation is a new clinically relevant means to report 3D spinal deformities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations127
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207