“The Controversy over a Teacher’s First Escape in the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake”: Exploring Folk-mentality Reflected via the Internet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study extracted the netizen’s comments about Meizhong Fan’s case by using the method of systematicsampling on the Homepage of MSN China. It employed a method of content analysis to explore thefolk-mentality reflected via the Internet. The study shows that both the affirmative and the negative netizensdon’t have significant differences in the comment dates. Both of them tend to report comments at the weekend.But, both the affirmative and the negative netizens have significant differences in the comment time. Theaffirmative netizens are significantly more than the negative netizens in browsing the Internet in the daytime, andat night the negative netizens are significantly more than the affirmative netizens in browsing the Internet. Boththe affirmative and the negative netizens have significant differences in dialectical dimension, and theaffirmative netizens are tend to be dialectical. Both the affirmative and the negative messages have significantdifferences between emotional / rational dimensions, between the forgivable / unforgivable dimensions and alsobetween the aggressive / unaggressive dimensions. The folk-mentality of netizens to the Meizhong Fan casetends to be emotional, unforgivable and aggressive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".