Conodonts and corals in kimberlite xenoliths confirm a Devonian seaway in central Ontario and Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eighteen samples containing sedimentary rock xenoliths were obtained from cores drilled into eight Mesozoic kimberlite pipes in the Kirkland Lake area, Ontario, and in Ontario and Quebec near Lake Timiskaming. Nine samples from five pipes contained fossils that were used for age determinations. These fossils are Middle or Late Ordovician graptolites, inarticulate brachiopods, and conodonts; Silurian and (or) Devonian conodonts; Early Devonian colonial corals; a Devonian stromatoporoid; and Early to Middle Devonian conodonts. Regionally, conodonts are unaltered (conodont colour alteration index, CAI 1). Conodont CAI values from the xenoliths are elevated (CAI 2), and a few conodonts have surface colour changes, suggesting hydrothermal alteration. Age determinations allow stratigraphic correlation between xenoliths and Paleozoic outcrops. For the Ordovician and Silurian samples, correlations are made to exposures in the nearby Lake Timiskaming outlier. For the Devonian samples, the closest possible correlative outcrops are about 300 km away. These fossils provide the first physical evidence of a connection between a Lake Timiskaming "basin" and other Ontario basins during at least part of the Devonian. These strata persisted at least until the Mesozoic before they were removed by erosion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".