Fetal thoracoamniotic shunting for large macrocystic congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations of the lung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fetal thoracoamniotic shunting for isolated large macrocystic congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations (CCAM) of the lung. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 11 fetuses with macrocystic CCAM who underwent thoracoamniotic shunting. This procedure was offered if fetal hydrops or signs of evolving hydrops (such as ascites or polyhydramnios) were present, or when there were very large lesions or lesions rapidly increasing in size. If there were multiple large cysts within the lesion, a single shunt was used, aiming to traverse several cysts. RESULTS: Shunts were inserted at a mean gestational age of 24.6 (range, 17-32) weeks. Marked mediastinal shift was present in all cases. Six fetuses were hydropic and, of the remaining five, one had severe polyhydramnios, three had lesions that were rapidly increasing in size and one had a very large lesion at initial presentation. In total, four cases had polyhydramnios. Shunting one cyst always decompressed the entire lesion and hydrops and/or polyhydramnios resolved in all surviving fetuses. One hydropic fetus that underwent the procedure at 17 weeks died 1 day later. The shunt dislodged in one case and the lesion did not re-expand. No mother went into labor or had ruptured membranes before 35.6 weeks. Mean gestational age at delivery was 38.2 weeks (n = 10). All pregnancies were delivered vaginally, with no maternal complications. All newborns had uneventful lobectomies, and pathology confirmed CCAM in all cases. CONCLUSION: Fetal thoracoamniotic shunting for large macrocystic CCAM is associated with favorable outcome in most cases, and should be considered in severe cases even before hydrops develops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.056 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".