Different breakage-prone regions on chromosome 1 detected in t(11;14)-positive mantle cell lymphoma cell lines and multiple myeloma cell lines are associated with different tumor progession-related mechanisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To better define secondary aberrations that occur in addition to translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32) in mantle cell lymphomas (MCL) and in multiple myelomas (MM), seven t(11;14)-positive MCL cell lines and four t(11;14)-positive MM cell lines were analysed by fluorescence R-banding and spectral karyotyping (SKY). Compared with published data obtained by G-banding, most chromosome aberrations were redefined or further specified. Furthermore, several additional chromosome aberrations were identified. Thus, these cytogenetically well defined t(11;14)-positive MCL and MM cell lines may be useful tools for the identification and characterization of genes that might be involved in the pathogenesis of MCL and MM, respectively. Since MCL and MM were found to have different alterations of chromosome 1, these were investigated in more detail by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and multicolor banding (MCB) analyses. The most frequently altered and deletion-prone loci in MCL cell lines were regions 1p31 and 1p21. In contrast, breakpoints in MM cell lines most often involved the heterochromatic regions 1p12-->p11, and the subcentromeric regions 1q12 and 1q21. These data are in accordance with previously published data of primary lymphomas. Our findings may indicate that different pathways of clonal evolution are involved in these morphologically distinct lymphomas harboring an identical primary chromosome aberration, t(11;14).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".