MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964563219 · doi:10.1109/tie.2014.2377131

Online Diagnostics of HTPEM Fuel Cells Using Small Amplitude Transient Analysis for CO Poisoning

2014· article· en· W1964563219 on OpenAlexaff
Chris de Beer, Paul Barendse, Pragasen Pillay, Brian Bullecks, Raghunathan Rengaswamy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)VoltageFault (geology)Proton exchange membrane fuel cellRange (aeronautics)PopulationFuel cellsEngineeringAmplitudeControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceReliability engineeringNuclear engineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent developments in materials have allowed PEM fuel cells to operate at higher temperatures and alleviate some of the problems that occur during operation. High-temperature PEM fuel cells are still under development, and very little has been done to study transient conditions, specifically the application of small amplitude load transients for diagnostic purposes. This paper presents the evolution of the fuel cell voltage transient for small current pulses over a range of operating conditions. A fault mechanism in the form of CO poisoning is introduced to further study and evaluate the transients for diagnostic purposes. A new two-stage diagnostic method is proposed based on the voltage transient. The first stage makes use of the discrete S-transform for fault marker identification and provides fast estimations on the fuel cell state of health. The second stage makes use of a population-based incremental learning (PBIL) algorithm for equivalent circuit parameter extraction, required for detailed diagnostics. The method is evaluated for both the healthy and the faulted CO poisoning condition in order to verify performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207