MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964617922 · doi:10.1577/m03-230.1

Evaluation of Hatchery versus Wild Sockeye Salmon Fry Growth and Survival in Two British Columbia Lakes

2005· article· en· W1964617922 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kim D. Hyatt, Karin L. Mathias, Donald J. McQueen, Brian Mercer, Patrick Milligan, D. Paul Rankin

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsYukon Department of EnvironmentVancouver Island UniversityFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHatcheryStockingFisheryBiologyAnimal scienceFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We evaluated the relative success of sockeye salmon hatchery fry stocking in two British Columbia–Alaska transboundary lakes (1,622-ha Tatsamenie Lake and 492-ha Tahltan Lake). Fry stocking began in the late 1980s and is still under way. During the study period, survival patterns in the two lakes were different. At Tatsamenie Lake, wild egg-to-fry survival was higher than hatchery egg-to-fry survival (11.3% versus 4.3%) and wild egg-to-smolt survival was higher than hatchery egg-to-smolt survival (5.8% versus 2.5%). We found no relationship between fry survival and stocking date, spawner abundance, or food availability in Tatsamenie Lake, but we did find a significant positive relationship between early-spring fry length and egg-to-fry survival. Also, we found that in net-pen experiments, larger fry survived better. From this, we concluded that hatchery fry stocked into Tatsamenie Lake may suffer from size-mediated mortality and that net-pen supplemental feeding could be used to overcome this problem. However, because eggs used for hatchery production come from the lake, fry stocking can only be justified when hatchery fry survival exceeds wild fry survival. At Tatsamenie Lake, this goal has not yet been attained. At Tahltan Lake, wild egg-to-fry survival was lower than hatchery egg-to-fry survival (1.5% versus 6.3%) and wild egg-to-smolt survival was lower than hatchery egg-to-smolt survival (3.6% versus 12.8%). Hatchery fry release date and food availability both failed to explain these differences in fry and smolt survival at Tahltan Lake. However, there was a strong negative relationship between total female escapement and wild egg-to-smolt survival. This supported the results of an earlier investigation, which suggested that Tahltan Lake was spawning-site limited. We concluded that at Tahltan Lake, hatchery fry stocking increased smolt numbers, is biologically justified, and should be continued.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American Journal of Fisheries ManagementSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207