Effet des imperfections géométriques sur la stabilité des coques élastiques cylindriques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of geometrical imperfections on the critical load of elastic cylindrical shells when subjected to axial compression are studied through analytical modelling. In addition to distributed defects of both axisymmetric or asymmetric forms, emphasis is put on the more severe case of localized defects satisfying the axial symmetry. The Von Kármán – Donnell shell equations were used. The obtained results show that shell strength at buckling varies very much with the defect amplitude. These variations are not monotonic in general. They indicate however a clear reduction of the shell critical load for some defects revealed as the most dangerous ones. The proposed method does not consider the complete coupled situation that may arise from interactions between several localized defects. It facilitates nevertheless straightforward initializing of closer analyses if such couplings are to be taken into account by means of special numerical approaches, because it enables fast a priori selection of the most hazardous isolated defects.Key words: stability, buckling, imperfections, thin shells, silos, localized defects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it