MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964708344 · doi:10.1139/b02-005

Seasonal changes in chlorophyll fluorescence quenching and the induction and capacity of the photoprotective xanthophyll cycle in <i>Lobaria pulmonaria</i>

2002· article· en· W1964708344 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tyler D. B. MacKenzie, Marianna Król, Norman P. A. Hüner, Douglas A. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXanthophyllTemperate deciduous forestChlorophyll fluorescencePopulationBotanyDeciduousCanopyPhotoprotectionBiologyChlorophyllChemistryPhotosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm. survives large changes in ambient light and temperature between winter and summer in temperate deciduous forests. Potential photosystem II (PSII) electron transport, measured at 20°C using chlorophyll fluorescence analysis, was consistent in thallus samples taken in March and August from a temperate deciduous forest, while the potential for nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) was higher in March than in August. NPQ was, however, similar in March and August in a population from a coniferous site with a permanently closed canopy. Thalli measured at a typical March field temperature showed a depression of PSII electron transport, q p and gross CO 2 uptake and a rise in realized NPQ. Xanthophyll cycle pigments were more abundant in the March than in the August samples in the deciduous forest populations but did not change significantly in the permanently closed-canopy population. In August, relatively low NPQ correlated with xanthophyll pool size in the deciduous forest samples. The more intense NPQ derived from low temperature and low CO 2 -electron demand in the March samples, however, was not correlated with xanthophyll pool size. Thus, most of the NPQ observed in the high light exposure March samples was not explained by variation in xanthophyll pool size.Key words: carotenoids, excitation quenching, lichen, nonphotochemical quenching, PSII electron transport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicLichen and fungal ecologyFrench-language works237,207