The series Os<sub>4</sub>(µ<i><sub>x</sub></i>-η<sup>2</sup>-C<sub>2</sub>Ph<sub>2</sub>)(CO)<sub>14</sub><i><sub>n</sub></i> (<i>n</i> = 0, 1, 2; <i>x</i> = <i>n</i> + 2) Models for site-specific surface catalysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cluster Os4(µ-η2-C2Ph2)(CO)14 (1) has been prepared from the reaction of Os4(CO)14 and C2Ph2 in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C. Other minor products include the known clusters Os3(µ3-η2-C2Ph2)(CO)10 and Os3(µ-η4-C4Ph4)(CO)9. The structure of 1 reveals an approximately planar C2Os4 skeleton with a dimetallacyclobutene ring (CC = 1.32(4) Å) and a flat butterfly Os4 unit (OsOs range = 2.859(2)2.916(2) Å). The 13C{1H} NMR spectrum of 1 indicates the carbonyl ligands are rigid at room temperature. Stirring 1 in CH2Cl2 for 2 days (ambient temperature) afforded Os4(µ3-η2-C2Ph2)(CO)13 (2). The Os atoms in 2 also have an almost flat butterfly arrangement (OsOs range = 2.7392(7)2.8947(6) Å) with the alkyne ligand located over one of the Os3 triangles. The 13C NMR data for 2 are consistent with rapid rotation on the NMR timescale of the hinge Os(CO)3 units at 21 °C, but slow rotation at 50 °C. Heating 2 at 40 °C gave Os4(µ4-η2-C2Ph2)(CO)12 (3) after 2 days. Cluster 3 has the common butterfly arrangement of Os atoms with the C2Ph2 bound to all four metal atoms (OsOs range = 2.7457(5)2.8742(5) Å). The 13C{1H} NMR spectra of 3 at 21 and 90 °C indicate there is rapid CO exchange of the carbonyls of the two types of Os(CO)3 units, but not between the units. The spectrum at 90 °C indicates one of the rotations (presumed to be that involving the carbonyls of the wingtip Os(CO)3 units) is slowed on the NMR timescale. Compounds 13 form a unique series of clusters that have an alkyne ligand bound to two, three, and four metal atoms. Compound 1 is a model for a corner, compound 2 for a planar surface, and compound 3 a step site, in site-specific surface catalysts.Key words: osmium cluster, diphenylacetylene, dimetallacyclobutene, carbonyl exchange, surface catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".