MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964764563 · doi:10.17722/ijme.v4i3.192

The Management of Leadership and Innovation

2015· article· en· W1964764563 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
James E. Smith, Allison Arnold, Samantha Melroy

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Management Excellence · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Leadership and Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessProcess managementIndustrial organizationKnowledge managementComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conceptualization, nourishment and propagation of new technologies, as a key, active component in theaccelerated growth of a technologically advanced or industrialized society, relies on the understanding and development oftwo individual but highly interconnected competencies: leadership and innovation. These are the two fundamental attributesthat have encouraged the successful development of most major technologies in production today. They are also the sourcefor most of the highly successful commercial and industrial organizations currently operating globally. It is the state ofhealth of these two linked competencies that often determines the longevity and profitability of these organizations and, to alarge extent, the societies that spawn and house them. It is also through their successful integration that those sametechnologies are encouraged to evolve and to fuel the imaginations of the next set of great leaders and innovators. It can thusbe postulated that the stewardship of innovation and leadership determines the potential success and the rate of advancementof a modern society and, as a corollary, the lack thereof its decay, or at best its stagnation. This discussion is directed to thetwo characteristics of leadership and innovation and how they create value through integration and how we as a society gainfrom this successful union.This article is, therefore, dedicated to anything, or anyone, that might lead us to innovation, in all of its forms, along with theleadership that is often the springboard, or tipping point, in making it all happen. It is through the innovative process wherewe all get the chance to generate creative thought. It should therefore become our common goal to encourage others topursue their own personal view, or quest, for the future, while in other cases, to simply get out of the way of those who aretrying to do the same. Change, while often uncomfortable, and habitually avoided or ignored, is the nature of anyprogressive system. Staying ahead of the problems created by change while jumping even farther ahead is a prerequisite tosuccess and continued growth. The result of this constant requirement to advance the elements of a modern society, whilescary, also forces the participants to live at the edge of their comfort zones. An innovative change, in any form will bring youto that edge. Therefore, it has become clear that innovators, and their dedicated leadership, will continue to add to theexcitement in all of our lives, whether we are ready for it or not

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Management ExcellenceSame topicOrganizational Leadership and Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207