MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964766614 · doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e3181f8fa3b

Prediction of Pulmonary Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Femur Fracture

2010· article· en· W1964766614 on OpenAlexaff
Kelly A. Lefaivre, Adam J. Starr, Philip F. Stahel, Alan C. Elliott, Wade R. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineARDSFemurOdds ratioGlasgow Coma ScaleConfidence intervalFemur fractureInjury Severity ScoreSurgeryHip fractureFemoral fracturePoison controlInternal medicineOsteoporosisInjury preventionEmergency medicineLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the effect of femur fractures on mortality, pulmonary complications, and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In addition, we aimed to compare the effect of femur fractures with other major musculoskeletal injuries and to determine the effect of timing to surgery on these complications. METHODS: All patients were identified from the trauma registries of two Level I trauma centers. Outcomes were defined at mortality in hospital, pulmonary complications, and ARDS in hospital. Regression analysis was used to determine the effect of femur fractures, while controlling for age, Abbreviated Injury Scales, Glasgow Coma Scale, and systolic blood pressure at presentation. We compared femur fractures with other major musculoskeletal injuries in similar models. Within the patients with femur fracture, time to surgery (< 8 hours, 8 hours to 24 hours, and > 24 hours) was evaluated using similar regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the total 90,510 patients, 3,938 (4.35%) died in the hospital, 2,055 (2.27%) had a pulmonary complication, and 285 (0.31%) developed ARDS. Femur fracture is statistically predictive of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.606; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.288-2.002) and pulmonary complications (OR, 1.659; 95% CI, 1.329-2.070), when controlling for other injury factors. This was comparable with the effect of pelvic fracture and other major musculoskeletal injuries. Femur fracture had a strong relationship with ARDS (OR, 2.129; 95% CI, 1.382-3.278). Patients treated in the 8 hours to 24 hours window had the lowest mortality risk (OR, 0.140; 95% CI, 0.052-0.375), and there was a trend to increased risk of ARDS in a delay to surgery of > 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Femur fractures are a major musculoskeletal injury and increase the risk of mortality and pulmonary complications as much as any other musculoskeletal injuries. There is a unique relationship between ARDS and femur fractures, and this must be considered carefully in treatment planning for these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical CareSame topicHip and Femur FracturesFrench-language works237,207