Rb–Sr and U–Pb geochronology and setting of the Buffalo Head Hills kimberlite field, northern AlbertaThis article is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue on the theme<i>Geology of northeastern British Columbia and northwestern Alberta: diamonds, shallow gas, gravel, and glaciers</i>.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New Rb–Sr phlogopite and U–Pb perovskite age determinations for 12 of 38 known ultramafic bodies in the Buffalo Head Hills area of north-central Alberta show that kimberlitic magmatism occurred in at least two separate episodes during Late Cretaceous and Paleocene time. Nine kimberlites yield Coniacian to Campanian ages of between 88 ± 5 Ma (U–Pb perovskite, K5A) and 81.2 ± 2.3 Ma (Rb–Sr phlogopite, K252). A Danian U–Pb perovskite isochron age of 63.5 ± 0.7 Ma was obtained for the BM2 kimberlite, and Selandian Rb–Sr ages of 59.6 ± 2.8 and 60.3 ± 0.8 Ma were determined for the K1A and K19 bodies, respectively. These specific periods of magmatism correspond to characteristic intra-field features such as kimberlite spatial distribution, diamond content, rock classification, and mechanisms of emplacement. The ∼88–81 Ma group generally occurs in the northwestern part of the field and defines the diamond window for the Buffalo Head Hills kimberlite field. This volcanism is contemporaneous with sedimentary host rock deposition, which has important implications for the size and morphological complexity of the kimberlite bodies. The ∼64 Ma BM2 body represents the only known occurrence of hypabyssal-facies kimberlite in this field and is similar in terms of source composition to the ∼88–81 Ma kimberlites, but is not diamond bearing. The ∼60 Ma group occurs in the southwestern part of the field, is derived from a weakly diamondiferous – barren hybrid ultramafic source and features bodies that are eroded to present-day stratigraphic levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".