MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gear Fault Diagnosis Using Synchro-Squeezing Transform Based Feature Analysis

2013· article· en· W1965020189 on OpenAlexaff
Budhaditya Hazra, Sriram Narasimhan

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchroHilbert–Huang transformWavelet transformSignal processingRobustness (evolution)Continuous wavelet transformInstantaneous phaseS transformTime–frequency analysisSIGNAL (programming language)EngineeringElectronic engineeringNoise (video)WaveletFault (geology)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceDiscrete wavelet transformComputer visionDigital signal processingWhite noiseElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synchro-squeezing transform has recently emerged as a powerful signal processing tool in non-stationary signal processing. Premised upon the concept of time-frequency (TF) reassignment, its basic objective is to provide a sharper representation of signals in the TF plane and extract the individual components of a non-stationary multi-component signal, akin to empirical mode decomposition (EMD). The rich mathematical structure based on continuous wavelet transform (CWT) makes synchro-squeezing powerful for gear fault diagnosis, as faulty gear signal is frequently constituted out of multiple amplitude-modulated and frequency-modulated signals embedded in noise. This work utilizes the decomposing power of synchro-squeezing transform to extract the IMFs from a gear signal followed by the application of standard gearbox condition indicators which promises greater prognostic power than that can be achieved by applying condition indictors directly to the inherently complex gear signals. The efficacy and the robustness of the algorithm are demonstrated with the aid of practical experimental data obtained from a helicopter gear box.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKey engineering materialsSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207