MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965023640 · doi:10.1080/07352689.2011.572033

Biology and Biochemistry of Plant Phospholipases

2011· article· en· W1965023640 on OpenAlexaffabout
Guanqun Chen, Crystal L. Snyder, Michael S. Greer, Randall J. Weselake

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Reviews in Plant Sciences · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyIsozymePhospholipasePhospholipase ABiochemistryBiotechnologyComputational biologyEnzymePhospholipase A2

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Phospholipases are a complex group of enzymes that hydrolyze phospholipids. The plant phospholipase family is composed of multiple members with varying positional specificity, and each type is represented by multiple isoforms distinguishable by their structural, catalytic, and physiological characteristics. A large number of phospholipase genes and gene families have been identified and the biochemical properties of several members have been characterized, revealing considerable molecular and catalytic diversity. Forward and reverse genetics has further revealed that phospholipases are widely involved in physiological processes including lipid metabolism, cell signaling, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Such studies have highlighted the potential biotechnological value of phospholipases as targets for improving stress tolerance. The catalytic diversity of various phospholipase isoforms is also of increasing interest for industrial biocatalysis. This review focuses on recently acquired information on biochemical, molecular and functional aspects of plant phospholipases. Keywords: phospholipaselipid metabolismlipid messengerssignal transductionphosphatidic acidstress responseslipid acyl hydrolaselipasedroughtwoundingcell elongationshoot gravitropismlysophospholipiddiacylgly- cerol ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, AVAC Ltd, and the Canada Research Chairs Program. This work is also part of the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme sponsored project: Industrial Crops producing value Oils for Novel chemicals (ICON). We would like to thank Dr. David Hildebrand for reviewing the manuscript.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Reviews in Plant SciencesSame topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207