MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Experience of a Single Romanian Center on CRRT

2003· article· en· W1965080911 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M Voiculescu, Camelia Ionescu, Gener Ismail, M. Roşu, A Sigheti

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRenal functionHemodialysisRenal replacement therapyAnasarcaGastroenterologyInternal medicineSeptic shockSepsisSurgeryUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Daily or intermittent hemodialysis in ARF is, in general, efficient, but the procedure has various complications due to associated comorbidities and unphysiological ways of renal substitution. The aim of the study was to establish the efficiency (hydro-electrolytic equilibrium, acido-basic equilibrium, fluid balance, evolution of renal function, patient survival) and complications (hypotension, hemorrhagic, vascular access, etc.) during CRRT. We performed CRRT in 24 pts with ARF on native kidney (n = 20) or renal transplant (n = 4). In 19 cases (M = 11, F = 8, mean age = 43.2 ± 15.7 y, BW = 49 ± 7.5 kg, mean BP = 107 ± 16.6 mmHg) we made CVVHF and in 11 cases (M = 6, F = 5, mean age = 39 ± 9.9 y, BW = 55.5 ± 5.6 kg, mean BP = 104 ± 18.8 mmHg) CVVHDF. 16pts (66.6%) have been associated severe, one or more comorbidities: MSOF in 2 pt, sepsis in 3pt, coma in 2 pts, anasarca in 6 pts (1pt hepatic cirrhosis, 1pt severe cardiac failure and 4pts nephrotic syndrome), CID in 1pt, acute pancreatitis in 3 pt, liver failure and hepato-renal syndrome in 1 pt. Mean period of CVVHF was 21.6 ± 11.3 h with a mean blood flow rate of 116.9 ± 16.4 ml/min and an ultrafiltration rate of 6.42 ± 4.6 ml/min. Creatininemia level decreased from 12.6 to 8.3 mg% and urea level decreased from 237 to 166 mg%. In CVVHDF mean period of procedure was 24.0 ± 8.5 h, mean blood flow 134 ± 15.2 ml/min and mean ultrafiltration rate 5.6 ± 2.1 ml/min. Decreased of creatininemia level was from 11.6 to 6.36 mg% and for urea level from 236 to 137 mg%. Vascular approach was by jugular vein in 15 pts, femoral vein in 6 pts, subclavia vein in 1 pt and native fistula in 2 pts. Anticoagulation was performed with UHF in 14 pts and LMWH in 9 pts. In 1 pt anticoagulation was performed by repeated washback with saline solution. Renal function was recovery completely in 8 pts (33.3%), partially in 4 pts (17.2%) and 10 pts (41.7%) goes to chronic HD. Survival rate was 100% in CVVHF and 82% in CVVVHDF (2 pts died). Complications of procedures appear in 5/24 pts (20.8%) and were represented by cardiac events (hypotension in 2 pts, arrhythmia in 1 pt), bleeding disorders (hemorrhages in 2 pts, clotting in dialyser or lines in 4 pts) and diselectrolithemias (hypophosphatemia in 2 pts). In 1 pt has been necessary to change the femoral catheter to subclavia site due to thrombosis. In conclusion, continuous renal replacement therapy is efficient and well tolerated with a low frequency of complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicLiver Disease and Transplantation→French-language works237,207→