Ancestry of <i>KNOX</i> genes revealed by bryophyte (<i>Physcomitrella patens</i>) homologs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Structural and phylogenetic studies of KNOX genes identified in the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens are reported here, to provide insights into the evolution of class 1 and class 2 KNOX genes. Three KNOTTED1 ‐like homeobox ( KNOX ) genomic clones were isolated and sequenced from P. patens . Corresponding cDNAs from a library, prepared from mRNA transcripts isolated from gametophytic tissues, were also sequenced. Conceptual translation and analysis of the bryophyte coding sequences revealed a domain pattern and secondary structures typical of higher plant KNOX proteins. Intron number and positions within the genes were also highly conserved between moss and angiosperm loci, providing further support for their homology. Structural and phylogenetic analyses indicated that moss clones ( MKN2 and MKN4 ) represent class 1 KNOX genes and the remaining clone ( MKN1–3 ) is a class 2 KNOX gene. We conclude that the observed protein domain pattern is encoded by homeobox genes that evolved after separation of the plant lineage from that of fungi and animals, and must have been present in the common ancestor to mosses and seed plants. It is proposed that gene duplication and diversification, which created class 1 and 2 KNOX gene subfamilies, occurred after separation of this common ancestor from its algal progenitor (since a characterized algal KNOX gene cannot be assigned to class 1 or 2), but before the moss and higher plant lineages diverged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".