Creation of a Fully Functional Cysteine-Less Variant of Osmosensor and Proton-Osmoprotectant Symporter ProP from <i>Escherichia coli </i>and Its Application to Assess the Transporter's Membrane Orientation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transporter ProP of Escherichia coli is an osmosensor and an osmoprotectant transporter. Previous results suggest that medium osmolality determines the proportions of ProP in active and inactive conformations. A cysteine-less (Cys-less) variant was created and characterized as a basis for structural and functional analyses based on site-directed Cys substitution and chemical labeling of ProP. Parameters describing the osmosensory and osmoprotectant transport activities of Cys-less ProP-(His)(6) variants were examined, including the threshold for osmotic activation and the absolute transporter activity at high osmolality (in both cells and proteoliposomes), the dependence of K(M) and V(max) for proline uptake on osmolality, and the rate constant for transporter activation in response to an osmotic upshift (in cells only). Variant ProP-(His)(6)-C112A-C133A-C264V-C367A (designated ProP) retained similar activities to ProP-(His)(6) in both cells and proteoliposomes. The bulky Val residue was favored over Ala or Ser at position 264, whereas Val strongly impaired function when placed at position 367, highlighting the importance of residues at those positions for osmosensing. In the ProP* background, variants with a single Cys residue at positions 112, 133, 241, 264, 293, or 367 retained full function. The native Cys at positions 112, 133, 264, and 367, predicted to be within transmembrane segments of ProP, were poorly reactive with membrane-impermeant thiol reagents. The reactivities of Cys at positions 241 and 293 were consistent with exposure of those residues on the cytoplasmic and periplasmic surfaces of the cytoplasmic membrane, respectively. These observations are consistent with the topology and orientation of ProP predicted by hydropathy analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".