The Y chromosome-specific STS marker MS2 and its peripheral regions on the Y chromosome of the dioecious plant<i>Silene latifolia</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sex determination in Silene latifolia uses the XX/XY system. The recent evolution of dioecy in S. latifolia provides a unique opportunity to study the early stages of Y chromosome evolution. However, the current Y chromosome map still contains many large gaps with no available markers. In this study, a sequence tagged site (STS) marker, MS2, was isolated and mapped to the same locus as L8 on the Y chromosome. To investigate the peripheral regions of MS2, a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library was constructed from a male plant, and the BAC clone containing MS2 (MS2-9d12F) was isolated from 32 640 clones with an average insert size of 115 kb. A 109-kb insert of the BAC clone was analyzed. BLASTX analysis showed 11 sequences similar to some known proteins, most of which are retrotransposon-like elements. The ORF Finder predicted 9 ORFs within MS2-9d12F. RT-PCR analyses revealed that only 4 of the 9 predicted ORFs are expressed in both male and female plants. These 4 ORFs are candidates for genes having counterparts on both the X and Y chromosomes. Dot-matrix plot analysis and a BLASTN search revealed LTR-like sequences close to the retrotransposon-like elements and high similarity to 3 known genomic sequences of S. latifolia. These results suggest an accumulation of retrotransposons and segmental duplications in peripheral regions of MS2 during the early stage of sex chromosome evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".