The diagnosis and management of post-cesarean section hemorrhagic shock
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The cesarean section (CS) is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide, performed by suturing or not suturing the visceral peritoneum. In the case of not suturing the visceral peritoneum, pathological fluid collections can arise in this space and spill into the large peritoneal cavity, creating a hemoperitoneum. METHODS: In this retrospective study we evaluated 3890 repeat and first CS, performed under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, over the last 10 years. In all the CS evaluated, we excluded those performed with open parietal peritoneum and the classical CS by closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum. RESULTS: Three important early puerperal post-CS complications with hypovolemic shock signs were detected, urgently treated by two relaparotomies and a laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The scientific literature reports the early benefit of not suturing the visceral peritoneum during CS, but in rare cases, early and dangerous complications occur. The post-CS hemoperitoneum must be detected immediately by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasonography, and must be treated by needle aspiration in slight cases and by laparoscopy or laparotomy in heavy cases, with drainage and accurate hemostasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".