Three‐component‐mediated serotype conversion in <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> by bacteriophage D3
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacteriophage D3 is capable of lysogenizing Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (serotype O5), converting the O-antigen from O5 to O16 and O-acetylating the N-acetylfucosamine moiety. To investigate the mechanism of lysogenic conversion, a 3.6 kb fragment from the D3 genome was isolated capable of mediating serotypic conversion identical to the D3 lysogen strain (AK1380). The PAO1 transformants containing this 3.6 kb of D3 DNA exhibited identical lipopolysaccharide (LPS) banding patterns to serotype O16 in silver-stained SDS-PAGE gels and displayed reactivity to an antibody specific for O-acetyl groups. Further analysis led to the identification of three open reading frames (ORFs) required for serotype conversion: an alpha-polymerase inhibitor (iap); an O-acetylase (oac); and a beta-polymerase (wzybeta). The alpha-polymerase inhibitor (Iap) is capable of inhibiting the assembly of the serotype-specific O5 B-band LPS and allows the phage-encoded beta-polymerase (Wzybeta) to form new beta-linked B-band LPS. The D3 phage also alters the LPS by the addition of O-acetyl groups to the FucNAc residue in the O-antigen repeat unit by the action of the D3 O-acetylase (Oac). These three components form a simple yet elegant system by which bacteriophage D3 is capable of altering the surface of P. aeruginosa PAO1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".