MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965264473 · doi:10.3928/00485713-20080801-01

Translating Best Practices into Service: Implementing Early Intervention for Psychosis across Canada

2008· article· en· W1965264473 on OpenAlexaffabout
Suzanne Archie, Heather Hobbs, Natasja M. Menezes

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric Annals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CareSt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBest practiceJurisdictionHealth carePsychologyIntervention (counseling)Political scienceNursingManagementMedicinePublic relationsPsychiatryLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Canada is a large, diversely populated country with numerous early intervention (EI) services that have unique characteristics. Many challenges have made the implementation of such services an interesting process that can inform service delivery and program development. Families, consumers, and non-profit organizations have played pivotal roles in advocating for provincial funding of EI services. Many provinces have developed policies for the roll-out of EI services within their jurisdiction, policies that reflect the key principles of the EI paradigm. Canadian centers have developed internationally recognized research programs on first-episode psychosis and EI. Although many provinces have adapted best practice guidelines, many differences exist within and between provinces in the delivery of EI services. Upholding the tenants of EI, while optimizing resource allocation across wide distances and varied populations, remains a challenging balancing act. Yet this task is well worthwhile, given the potential for positive impact by providing timely and high-quality care to young people and their families who are coping with the early stages of psychosis. This overview summarizes the translation of best practices into service delivery for EI programs across Canada. </p> <h4>ABOUT THE AUTHORS</h4> <p>Suzanne Archie, MD, FRCP(C), is Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, and Clinical Director, Cleghorn Program, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Heather Hobbs, RN, BScN, CBSDipl, Care Coordinator, Cleghorn Program, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton. Natasja Menezes, MDCM, MSc, FRCP(C), is Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, and is Psychiatrist, Cleghorn Program, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton. </p> <p>Address correspondence to: Suzanne Archie, MD, FRCP(C), 703-25 Charlton Ave. E., Hamilton, ON L8N 1Y2 Canada; fax 905-525-2805; or e-mail <a href="mailto:jbuffet@mcmaster.ca">jbuffet@mcmaster.ca</a>. </p> <p>Dr. Archie, Ms. Hobbs, and Dr. Menezes have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.</p> <p>The authors would like to thank Julie Buffet for all of her assistance in preparing this article. They would also like to thank and acknowledge the following people for the information they provided about early intervention services: Amal Abdel-Baki, Don Addington, Terry Bedard, Gretchen Conrad, Mirella Fata, Tom Hall, Laura Hansen, L. Hanson, Janice Harris, Bill Honer, Cathy Kavanagh, Annette King, Christina Krack, Gord Langill, Elizabeth Lines, Eric Macnaughton, Karen O’Connor, Kola Oyewumi, Bonnie Pape, Karen Tee, John Trainor, and Cheryl Zufelt.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric AnnalsSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207