MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1965266492 · doi:10.1029/2009jd013440

Response of Arctic 1000 hPa circulation to changes in horizontal resolution and sea ice forcing in the Community Atmospheric Model

2010· article· en· W1965266492 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Higgins, John J. Cassano

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimatologyArcticSea iceGeologyAtmospheric modelForcing (mathematics)Sea surface temperatureArctic ice packAtmospheric circulationArctic oscillationOceanographyEnvironmental scienceNorthern Hemisphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arctic winter surface atmospheric circulation biases inherent to the Community Atmospheric Model version 3 (CAM3) are examined with emphasis on the influence of horizontal resolution (T42, ∼2.8° versus T85, ∼1.4°). Using geopotential height at 1000 hPa (Z1000) to represent surface circulation, the self‐organizing map technique is used to better understand these biases from a synoptic climatology perspective. The previously documented low sea level pressure (SLP) bias over the Beaufort Sea, Canadian Archipelago, Greenland Sea, Norwegian Sea, and northern Europe and high SLP bias over the northern Pacific and Atlantic oceans are shown to result from an underprediction of weak Aleutian and Icelandic low patterns and an overprediction of strong Arctic low patterns, strong Icelandic low patterns, and patterns with pronounced ridges spanning the Arctic Ocean. Resolution‐caused differences are shown to be the result of CAM3 at T85 resolution predicting fewer strong Icelandic lows, North Atlantic lows, and strong high‐pressure ridges across the Arctic relative to CAM3 at T42 resolution. In addition, CAM3 at T85 resolution predicts more strong Arctic low patterns relative to CAM3 at T42 resolution. The ability of CAM3 at both resolutions to resolve mesoscale features such as polar lows near the sea ice edge is also explored. Despite these biases, CAM3 can still be used experimentally to examine atmospheric response to changing climatic conditions, particularly if results are viewed in the framework of a sensitivity study. With this in mind, the impact of future projections of sea ice on winter Arctic circulation is examined at both model resolutions. It is found that weak Arctic low patterns and strong Icelandic low patterns increase in frequency in the winter, while Aleutian/Icelandic low patterns and North Atlantic low/Pacific high patterns decrease in frequency in the winter with future projections of sea ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→