MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965305830 · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2013.2256772

A Multiple-Detection Joint Probabilistic Data Association Filter

2013· article· en· W1965305830 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClutterComputer scienceProbabilistic logicData associationFilter (signal processing)Radar trackerArtificial intelligenceTracking (education)Multipath propagationAlgorithmRadarPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most conventional target tracking algorithms assume that a target can generate at most one measurement per scan. However, there are tracking problems where this assumption is not valid. For example, multiple detections from a target in a scan can arise due to multipath propagation effects as in the over-the-horizon radar (OTHR). A conventional multitarget tracking algorithm will fail in these scenarios, since it cannot handle multiple target-originated measurements per scan. The Joint Probabilistic Data Association Filter (JPDAF) uses multiple measurements from a single target per scan through a weighted measurement-to-track association. However, its fundamental assumption is still one-to-one. In order to rectify this shortcoming, this paper proposes a new algorithm, called the Multiple-Detection Joint Probabilistic Data Association Filter (MD-JPDAF) for multitarget tracking, which is capable of handling multiple detections from targets per scan in the presence of clutter and missed detection. The multiple-detection pattern, which can account for many-to-one measurement set-to-track association rather than one-to-one measurement-to-track association, is used to generate multiple detection association events. The proposed algorithm exploits all the available information from measurements by combinatorial association of events that are formed to handle the possibility of multiple measurements per scan originating from a target. The MD-JPDAF is applied to a multitarget tracking scenario with an OTHR, where multiple detections occur due to different propagation paths as a result of scattering from different ionospheric layers. Experimental results show that multiple-detection pattern based probabilistic data association improves the state estimation accuracy. Furthermore, the tracking performance of the proposed filter is compared against the Posterior Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (PCRLB), which is explicitly derived for the multiple-detection scenario with a single target.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it