MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965359815 · doi:10.1139/v10-071

Is the oxygen “side-on”, or “end-on” and fluctional, in peroxyl radicals with magnetically equivalent oxygen atoms?

2010· article· en· W1965359815 on OpenAlexaffvenue
K. U. Ingold, Gino A. DiLabio

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaNational Institute for Nanotechnology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryOxygenTinRadicalOxygen atomHyperfine structureDensity functional theoryGroup (periodic table)Functional groupCrystallographyComputational chemistryAtomic physicsMoleculeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The g values that have been measured for the group-14 peroxyls are sufficiently similar to suggest that they all have very similar structures. However, the 17 O hyperfine splittings seem to indicate that tin peroxyls have structures that differ from their lighter group-14 analogs. We hypothesize that the oxygen atoms in tin peroxyls are magnetically equivalent because they undergo a rapid 1,2-shift. Density-functional and wave-function theory calculations support this view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207