Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The therapeutic landscape (TL) concept recognises that places and settings encompass physical/built, symbolic and social environments that all relate, in combination, to achieving renewal, healing or, at the very least, a sense of well-being. These relationships have been observed repeatedly in the case of material, real-world religious/spiritual pilgrimages and have been shown to be conducive to healing. Employing the TL concept, this phenomenological research specifically explores the experience of cyberpilgrimage, the phenomenon of embarking on pilgrimages over the Internet. A sample of four devotional Catholic cyberpilgrimage websites are explored to shed light on whether they contain elements of the three characteristic TL themes: physical/built, symbolic and social environments. It is found that the websites do, in fact, reflect the TL themes, although differently in manner and extent. Keywords: cyberpilgrimagevirtual pilgrimagetherapeutic landscapeshealingspirituality Acknowledgements Many thanks to the reviewers who provided excellent commentary and suggestions for enhancement. Appreciation to Mirjana Vuksan who worked as a research assistant. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2011 International Medical Geography Symposium where delegates' comments were gladly received and incorporated herein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".