Response of older laying hens to an Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide challenge when fed diets with or without supplemental folic acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Folic acid plays a key role in nucleic acids and protein synthesis, and has been associated with anti-inflammatory effects in LPS-induced infections. To this end, a study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary folic acid (FA) supplementation in older laying hens (58 to 66 wk of age) challenged with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS). A total of 24 Shaver White laying hens at 58 wk were fed 2 diets. The diets were wheat-soybean-based, with either 0 or 4 mg of supplemental FA per kg of diet. After 8 wk of feeding and at 66 wk, the hens were injected intravenously with 8 mg of LPS or saline per kg of BW. Four hours after injection, blood was collected and hens were euthanized to obtain spleen and cecal tonsils. The T cell subsets in the blood and the spleen (CD4+ and CD8+), total IgG, and biochemical constituents (total protein, albumin, globulin, and fibrinogen) were not influenced (P > 0.05) by dietary FA supplementation. However, LPS injection decreased (P < 0.05) biochemical constituents, CD4+, and CD8+ cells in the blood, whereas CD4+:CD8+ ratio and total IgG increased (P < 0.05), and fibrinogen was not influenced. Gene expression in the spleen and cecal tonsils was not influenced by dietary FA supplementation except a diet × challenge interaction for interleukin (IL)-8 in the spleen; IL-8 decreased in FA-fed hens that were treated with LPS. Also, FA supplementation decreased the expression of IL-8 in cecal tonsils. Relative to saline-injected hens, expression of IL-1β, interferon-γ, and IL-10 increased in the LPS-injected hens in the spleen and cecal tonsils, IL-8 increased in LPS-injected hens only in the cecal tonsils, whereas Toll-like receptor 4, IL-4, IL-17, and IL-18 increased in the LPS-injected hens only in the spleen; however, LPS decreased expression of IL-13 in the cecal tonsils. In conclusion, FA did not affect inflammatory responses in older laying hens; more studies are required to investigate possible protective effects of FA in laying hens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".