Investigating the Hygiene Hypothesis as a Risk Factor in Pediatric Onset Crohn's Disease: A Case-Control Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence for the hygiene hypothesis in the etiology of Crohn's disease (CD) is unclear. We investigated the relationship between infection-related exposures and risk for CD in children. METHODS: A hospital-based case-control was carried out. Newly-diagnosed cases of CD (n = 194), less than 20 yr of age were recruited from the gastroenterology clinic of a large-pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center in Montreal, Canada. Orthopedic patients pair-matched (n = 194) for timing of diagnosis and area of residence were recruited as controls. Information on infection-related exposures between birth and disease diagnosis was ascertained by administering a structured questionnaire to the mother and the index subject. The relationship between the frequency and timing of infection-related exposures with CD was studied. RESULTS: The mean age (SD) at diagnosis was 12.3 (5.1). CD was more common after 10 yr of age. Gender distribution was similar between comparison groups. In multivariate conditional logistic regression, family history of IBD (odds ratio (OR) = 4.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6-13.3), age (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.1-1.3), and owning a pet (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 0.9-4.5) were associated with risk for CD, whereas regular use of a personal towel (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.2-0.9) and lesser crowding in homes (OR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.1-0.8) were protective. Day-care attendance during the first 6 months of life and "physician-diagnosed infections" between 5 and 10 yr of age were associated with increased risks for CD. CONCLUSIONS: Infection-related exposures seem to enhance risk for CD in children. The timing of these exposures during early childhood may be relevant to the etiology of pediatric CD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".