MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965444571 · doi:10.2118/02-01-05

Borehole Stability in Oil Sands Under Drilling

2002· article· en· W1965444571 on OpenAlexaffabout
R.C.K. Wong, K.C. Yeung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsSuncor Energy (Canada)University of Calgary
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBoreholeOil sandsDrillingGeotechnical engineeringDrilling fluidGeologyPetroleum engineeringAsphaltDeformation (meteorology)Materials scienceComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Holes were drilled in natural oil sands and reconstituted oilfree sand cores mounted inside a specially designed triaxial cell to investigate the borehole stability under hydrostatic loading. Tests involving hot water circulation inside the drilled hole were conducted to explore the effect of thermal heating and erosion on the borehole deformation. In addition, bitumen was removed from the oil sands matrix using chemical solvent extraction to study any reduction in strength. The deformation and failure of the hollow oil sands cylinders were monitored and studied using a computer tomography scanning method. Geotechnical properties of oil sands have been studied extensively in the past two decades [e.g., Dusseault and Morgenstern(1); Agar et al.(2).; Kosar(3); Wong et al(4); Samieh and Wong(5)]. However, most of the previous research was performed based on element (triaxial compression) tests in which the stress-strain properties were determined [e.g., Dusseault and Morgenstern(1); Vaziri(6); Wan et al(7); Samieh and Wong(8)]. Few attempts seem to have been made to conduct special tests simulating the stress paths encountered in drilling. Thus, it is not possible to evaluate the validity of these stress-strain models. In drilling wells in oil sands, the drilling mud temperature may rise to a value of about 30 – 40 °C higher than the ambient reservoir temperature(9). To reduce the risk of borehole instability, which may cause problems during the installation of liners, liquid nitrogen, dry ice, and commercial chilling units have been used to cool off the drilling mud temperature at surface. This cooling procedure could increase costs significantly in a commercial development. To date, there is no reported study on the effect of elevated temperature on borehole stability in oil sands during drilling. Does the reduction of the bitumen viscosity due to heating increase the pore pressure diffusion rate, triggering the collapse? Is thermal heating around the uncompleted borehole detrimental to the borehole structural integrity? This paper presents results of deformation behaviour of oil sands around a drilled hole subjected to hydrostatic loading, hot water circulation action, and chemical solvent extraction. The behaviours were studied using a computer tomography (X-Ray) imaging method. Though the interpretation of the testing results is complex, the testing results provide critical insight into the borehole stability phenomenon in oil sands under drilling. The main objective of the paper is to analyse the deformation characteristics of oil sands around a drilled hole under drilling environments. In addition, we assessed the validity of the existing oil sands stress-strain model for prediction and analysis of the results observed in the special hollow cylinder tests. Testing Material and Procedure Oil Sands Specimens The oil sands cores for this experimental study were recovered at a depth of 424 m from an observation well (3–66–4-W4M) at a site near Cold Lake, Alberta. Core sampling was carried out using a conventional rotary core barrel of 89 mm inside diameter. Cores recovered were frozen at site, and kept inside PVC tubes in a freezer. Prior to any testing, the frozen cores were X-Rayed for sample selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207