MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long-term follow-up after deferral of coronary intervention based on myocardial fractional flow reserve measurement

2005· article· en· W1965507965 on OpenAlex
Martin Mates, Vladimír Hraboš, Petr Hájek, Ondrej Rataj, Jan Vojáček

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCoronary Artery Disease · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFractional flow reserveCardiologyInternal medicinePercutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial infarctionConventional PCICoronary artery diseaseAnginaCoronary arteriesRevascularizationRight coronary arteryStenosisPopulationCircumflexArteryCoronary angiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Objective To assess long-term results after deferring coronary intervention (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) of an intermediate lesion with a value of myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≥0.75 in a ‘real life’ patient population with no respect to results of stress tests (if performed) or coronary disease extent. Methods PCI of an intermediate lesion was deferred in a group of 85 consecutive patients (54 men, 61±10 years) on the basis of the result of FFR ≥0.75 (mean FFR, 0.89±0.06%). FFR was measured in 111 stenoses (mean diameter stenosis, 54±8%, left anterior descending coronary artery, 65 (58%), left circumflex coronary artery, 24 (22%), right coronary artery, 22 (20%). Multi-vessel disease (defined as visually assessed diameter reduction of more than 50% in at least two arteries of more than 1.5 mm diameter, supplying at least two of the three major coronary artery perfusion territories) was present in 67% of patients (one-vessel disease, 28 patients (33%), two-vessel disease, 39 patients (46%), three-vessel disease, 18 patients (21%). Recorded events during follow-up were as follows: all-cause death, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target lesion transcatheter revascularization (TLR) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Angina class (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification) and the need for anti-anginal drugs were recorded. Results Follow-up was completed in 85 patients (100%). Mean duration of follow-up was 22.6±6.6 months (range 4–33 months). Events occurred in 11 patients (13%). Seven patients died; this included two cardiac deaths. A non-fatal myocardial infarction occurred in one patient, one patient needed TLR and three patients underwent CABG. Estimated 33 month cardiac-event-free survival (Kaplan–Meier) was 91±4%. Angina class decreased [1.6±1.2 compared with 0.8±0.8 (P<0.0001)] without difference with respect to the use of anti-anginal drugs (1.7±0.8 compared with 1.7±0.9, P=NS). Conclusions Deferring coronary interventions of intermediate stenosis based on FFR measurement is safe with respect to long-term follow-up, irrespective of the extent of coronary artery disease. The aim of the study was to assess long-term results after FFR guided deferral of coronary intervention (PCI) of intermediate stenosis in a “real life” non-selected patient population. PCI of a total of 111 intermediate stenosis with FFR=0.75 was deferred in 85 patients. Mortality and cardiac events were recorded during follow-up of 22.6±6.6 months (range 4-33 months). Events occurred in 11 patients (13%). Seven patients died, including 2 cardiac deaths, non-fatal MI in 1 patient and 3 patients underwent CABG. Estimated 33-months cardiac event-free survival (Kaplan-Mayer) was 91±4%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it