MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long-term follow-up after deferral of coronary intervention based on myocardial fractional flow reserve measurement

2005· article· en· W1965507965 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Mates, Vladimír Hraboš, Petr Hájek, Ondrej Rataj, Jan Vojáček

Bibliographic record

VenueCoronary Artery Disease · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFractional flow reserveCardiologyInternal medicinePercutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial infarctionConventional PCICoronary artery diseaseAnginaCoronary arteriesRevascularizationRight coronary arteryStenosisPopulationCircumflexArteryCoronary angiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Objective To assess long-term results after deferring coronary intervention (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) of an intermediate lesion with a value of myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≥0.75 in a ‘real life’ patient population with no respect to results of stress tests (if performed) or coronary disease extent. Methods PCI of an intermediate lesion was deferred in a group of 85 consecutive patients (54 men, 61±10 years) on the basis of the result of FFR ≥0.75 (mean FFR, 0.89±0.06%). FFR was measured in 111 stenoses (mean diameter stenosis, 54±8%, left anterior descending coronary artery, 65 (58%), left circumflex coronary artery, 24 (22%), right coronary artery, 22 (20%). Multi-vessel disease (defined as visually assessed diameter reduction of more than 50% in at least two arteries of more than 1.5 mm diameter, supplying at least two of the three major coronary artery perfusion territories) was present in 67% of patients (one-vessel disease, 28 patients (33%), two-vessel disease, 39 patients (46%), three-vessel disease, 18 patients (21%). Recorded events during follow-up were as follows: all-cause death, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target lesion transcatheter revascularization (TLR) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Angina class (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification) and the need for anti-anginal drugs were recorded. Results Follow-up was completed in 85 patients (100%). Mean duration of follow-up was 22.6±6.6 months (range 4–33 months). Events occurred in 11 patients (13%). Seven patients died; this included two cardiac deaths. A non-fatal myocardial infarction occurred in one patient, one patient needed TLR and three patients underwent CABG. Estimated 33 month cardiac-event-free survival (Kaplan–Meier) was 91±4%. Angina class decreased [1.6±1.2 compared with 0.8±0.8 (P<0.0001)] without difference with respect to the use of anti-anginal drugs (1.7±0.8 compared with 1.7±0.9, P=NS). Conclusions Deferring coronary interventions of intermediate stenosis based on FFR measurement is safe with respect to long-term follow-up, irrespective of the extent of coronary artery disease. The aim of the study was to assess long-term results after FFR guided deferral of coronary intervention (PCI) of intermediate stenosis in a “real life” non-selected patient population. PCI of a total of 111 intermediate stenosis with FFR=0.75 was deferred in 85 patients. Mortality and cardiac events were recorded during follow-up of 22.6±6.6 months (range 4-33 months). Events occurred in 11 patients (13%). Seven patients died, including 2 cardiac deaths, non-fatal MI in 1 patient and 3 patients underwent CABG. Estimated 33-months cardiac event-free survival (Kaplan-Mayer) was 91±4%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCoronary Artery DiseaseSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207