MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965518305 · doi:10.1002/pola.21685

Role of sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate in 2,2,6,6‐tetramethy‐1‐piperidinyloxy‐mediated styrene miniemulsion polymerization

2006· article· en· W1965518305 on OpenAlexaff
Marcus Lin, James C. C. Hsu, Michael F. Cunningham

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSodium dodecylbenzenesulfonateMiniemulsionPolymerizationStyreneChemistryPolymer chemistryPulmonary surfactantRadical polymerizationEmulsion polymerizationDodecylbenzeneSulfonateChemical engineeringCopolymerSodiumPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In studying 2,2,6,6‐tetramethy‐1‐piperidinyloxy (TEMPO)‐mediated styrene miniemulsions, we have observed that the surfactant sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS) not only provides colloidal stability but also influences the rate of polymerization. Increasing the SDBS concentration results in higher polymerization rates, although the molecular weight distribution and particle size distribution are not significantly impacted. We have also examined another common sulfonate surfactant, DOWFAX 8390. In contrast to SDBS, DOWFAX 8390 does not affect the polymerization rate. Furthermore, DOWFAX‐stabilized polymerizations are slower than SDBS‐stabilized polymerizations. TEMPO‐mediated bulk styrene polymerizations are also accelerated significantly in the presence of SDBS. Although the mechanism for the rate acceleration is unknown, the experimental evidence suggests that SDBS is participating in the generation of radicals capable of propagating, thereby reducing the TEMPO concentration within the particles. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 5974–5986, 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207