MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965526886 · doi:10.1007/s10545-006-0303-2

Ornithine transcarbamoylase deficiency presenting with acute liver failure

2006· article· en· W1965526886 on OpenAlexaff
Ahlam Mustafa, Joe T.R. Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineLethargyHyperammonemiaGastroenterologyFailure to thriveUrea cycleCoagulopathyLiver diseaseHepatic encephalopathyVomitingEndocrinologyPediatricsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ornithine transcarbamoylase (OTC) deficiency is the most common hereditary urea cycle disorder. It is an X-linked recessive disorder that usually presents with encephalopathy and hyperammonaemia. We report a 14-month-old female carrier of OTC deficiency, who presented with a history of intermittent vomiting for 5 weeks and irritability and lethargy for 1 week. She was found to be in acute liver failure, with elevated transaminases, coagulopathy and a consistently low urea. Identifying an OTC mutation and ruling out other possible causes of acute hepatic failure confirmed the diagnosis. She was placed on low-protein diet supplemented with essential amino acids, and her liver enzymes, hyperammonaemia and coagulopathy corrected. Three other female patients have been reported with OTC deficiency presenting with severe cryptogenic hepatitis; our patient is unique in that the presentation of her disease was dominated by acute liver failure on a back ground of normal growth and development, no liver enlargement, and mild hyperammonaemia. OTC deficiency should be considered in the differential diagnosis of infants presenting with acute hepatocellular dysfunction, especially in females.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Inherited Metabolic DiseaseSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207