Vitamin A Status in 137 Patients with Crohn’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Serum retinol and serum carotene concentrations were determined over a 6-month period in 137 outpatients with Crohn's disease. Serum retinol measurements were within the reference range for all patients at each assessment period, while serum carotene levels were low in about one quarter of the patients. Of the 56 patients who completed 48-hour stool collections, 41% had stool fat values exceeding the reference value. Serum retinol concentrations were not significantly correlated with the serum carotene concentrations, with the 48-hour stool fat content, or with the Crohn's disease activity. In contrast serum retinol concentrations were correlated with the dietary levels of vitamin A. Serum carotene concentrations were inversely correlated with the stool fat content but were not related to Crohn's disease activity or dietary levels of carotene or total vitamin A. Thus: (1) serum retinol concentrations were normal in this moderately large group of patients with Crohn's disease and did not reflect a low dietary vitamin A intake by 34% of the population; (2) serum carotene levels were frequently low in patients with Crohn's disease, possibly due to the presence of steatorrhea, but were not related to low dietary intakes of carotene or to active Crohn's disease, and (3) a low serum level of carotene does not indicate that the patient is at risk of developing vitamin A deficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".